Development and Practice of Additive Manufacturing Curriculum System for Emerging Engineering Education
Abstract
This paper presents the development and implementation of a comprehensive additive manufacturing (AM) course system tailored to the new engineering education framework. Emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, innovation, and practical skills, the course system integrates fundamental AM principles, hands-on applications, and interdisciplinary elements. The curriculum is structured into theoretical, practical, and elective modules, employing pedagogical strategies such as project-based learning and flipped classrooms. Initial outcomes indicate significant improvements in student performance and engagement, bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and real-world practice. Despite these successes, areas for enhancement include advanced laboratory facilities and increased industry collaboration. Future directions aim to incorporate innovative technologies and establish continuous feedback loops to ensure the course system’s relevance and effectiveness in preparing students for the evolving engineering landscape.
References
Arifin, S., et al. (2024). Management of Ahlussunnah wal Jama’ah-based curriculum development in Islamic education best practice. Educazione: Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.61987/educazione.v1i2.499
Barlösius, E. (2018). Concepts of originality in the natural science, medical, and engineering disciplines: An analysis of research proposals. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(6), 915–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918808370
Brundrett, M. (2014). School leadership and the primary curriculum: Development and practice. Routledge.
Chowdhury, M., & Dey, K. C. (2016). Intelligent transportation systems: A frontier for breaking boundaries of traditional academic engineering disciplines [Education]. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 8(4), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2015.2503199
Crawley, E., et al. (2018). Redesigning undergraduate engineering education at MIT – The new engineering education transformation (NEET) initiative. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–30923
Eisner, E. (1990). Creative curriculum development and practice. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 6(1), 62–73.
Hofmann, U., et al. (2023). Enhancing design for additive manufacturing education through a performance-based design challenge. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.163
Humo, E., & Popović, M. (1987). The new engineering disciplines and the adaptiveness and flexibility of university education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 12(3), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772870120308
Kaya, M., & Klahn, C. (2024). Design for additive manufacturing education of process engineering students on an industrial challenge. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.06.044
Prabhu, R., et al. (2020). Exploring the effects of additive manufacturing education on students’ engineering design process and its outcomes. Journal of Mechanical Design, 142(3), 032001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044324
Prabhu, R., et al. (2020). Teaching design freedom: Understanding the effects of variations in design for additive manufacturing education on students’ creativity. Journal of Mechanical Design, 142(12), 122001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046065
Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). Exploration on the construction of digital content security course under the background of “new engineering disciplines.” International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 7(4), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.31686/IJIER.VOL7.ISS4.1394
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
1.png)
