Interlinkages between Indicators of Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence from Seven Low Income and Lower Middle-Income Countries
Abstract
In 2015, 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted by member states of United Nations as a blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all. Up to date, the global indicator of framework of SDGs has 247 indicators (including repetitive indicators), which monitor progress of achieving the SDGs. The interlinkages and integration of SDG indicators have attracted attention from scholars and practitioners, however, there is limited existing knowledge of the interlinkages and interactions between SDG indicators in low income and lower middle-income countries.
This article therefore uses data from seven low income and lower middle-income countries to analyze the interlinkages between SDG indicators 9.2.1 and 9.4.1, which monitors the level of industrialization and energy efficiency in manufacturing sector respectively. It is widely believed that higher level industrialization will reduce energy emission per manufacturing value added. However, the results suggest that beyond traditional knowledge, in the seven selected countries, SDG indicators 9.2.1 and 9.4.1 are positively associated with each other. A possible reason of this unconventional finding is the country context, as in low income and lower middle-income countries the manufacturing industries are usually not energy-extensive, although not technology-intensive either. This article also calls for holistic and integrated approaches to use and interpret SDG indicators in line with the national and regional context.
References
Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010
Biggs, E. M., Bruce, E., Boruff, B., Duncan, J. M. A., Horsley, J., Pauli, N., … Imanari, Y. (2015). Sustainable development and the water-energy-food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods. Environmental Science and Policy, 54 (December), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.002
Cerf, M. E. (2019). Sustainable Development Goal Integration, Interdependence, and Implementation: the Environment–Economic–Health Nexus and Universal Health Coverage. Global Challenges, 3(9), 1900021. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201900021
Chandler, A. (1996). Statebuilding and Political Priorities in Post-Soviet Ukraine: The Role of the Military. Armed Forces & Society, 22(4), 573–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X9602200405
Griggs, D., Smith, M. S., Rockström, J., Öhman, M. C., Gaffney, O., Glaser, G., … Shyamsundar, P. (2014). An integrated framework for sustainable development goals. Ecology and Society, 19(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07082-190449
Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60 (January), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
IAEG-SDGs (2019). Tier Classification for Global SDG Indicators. Retrieved May 29, 2020, from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/iaeg-sdgs/tier-classification/
Moldavska, A., & Welo, T. (2019). A Holistic approach to corporate sustainability assessment: Incorporating sustainable development goals into sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50(January), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.004
Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature, 534(7607), 320–322. https://doi:10.1038/534320a
Schroeder, P., Anggraeni, K., & Weber, U. (2019). The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12732
Simpson, G. B., & Jewitt, G. P. W. (2019). The development of the water-energy-food nexus as a framework for achieving resource security: A review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7(February), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00008
Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., … O’Connell, D. (2017). Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3
UN General Assembly (2017). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017. A/RES/71/313.
UNIDO Statistics Data Portal (2019) SDG 9 database. Retrieved May 29, 2020, from https://stat.unido.org/SDG
Waage, J., Yap, C., Bell, S., Levy, C., Mace, G., Pegram, T., … Poole, N. (2015). Governing the UN sustainable development goals: Interactions, infrastructures, and institutions. The Lancet Global Health, 3(5), e251–e252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70112-9
Wong, R., & van der Heijden, J. (2019). Avoidance of conflicts and trade-offs: A challenge for the policy integration of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development, 27(5), 838–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1944
World Bank. (2020). World Bank Country and Lending Groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups#:~:text=For%20the%20current%202020%20fiscal,those%20with%20a%20GNI%20per accessed on 16 June 2016.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
