Conceptualizing Blockchain Technology in Utilization of Social Welfare Service for the Disabled
Abstract
This study analyzed factors influencing acceptance intention for blockchain technology in social welfare services for the disabled. Security and economics were the leading variables related to blockchain technology acceptance. Willingness to pay, fairness, and regulation were the leading variables reflecting characteristics of public services. UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) was used as a research model, and performance expectations, effort expectations, and social impact were considered. Based on the blockchain-based virtual disabled voucher process, this study utilized prior knowledge based on the use of rehabilitation center. The STATA / SE 12.0 statistical program was used to analyze demographic frequency, factor analysis, reliability, and structural equation modeling (SEM). Pay-out and fairness have the greatest influence on acceptance intention, and economic and regulatory factors are the next influential factors. Only economic performance has been identified as a leading variable influencing the expectations of effort, and security has been shown to affect only social impact. Economic performance influenced performance expectation, effort expectation, and social influence. Expectation of effort did not affect acceptance intention. This study provides useful information for establishing a practical strategy when introducing blockchain technology to the public service called disabled welfare.
References
Bae, Y. L., Choi, J. K., & Shin, H. R. (2018). Suggestions for Building Public Chain Based Block Chain. Research Institute, Issue & Diagnosis, 328, 1-21.
Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp Berlag. Hong Sung Tae (Translated), 1997. Risk Society - For New Modernity (Sex)." Seoul: Newspaper.
Cavoukian, A. (2017). Global privacy and security, by design: Turning the “privacy vs. security” paradigm on its head. Health and Technology, 7(4), 329-333.
Chan, N. J. (2015). Factors of Acceptance of Public Safety Services Using the Internet of Things. Master Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul.
Chung, S. H. (2016). Legal Tasks for Introduction of Distributed Ledger Based on Block Chain Technology. The Korean Journal of Financial Law, 13(2), 107-135.
David, S., & Craig, M. (2015). Beyond bitcoin: Blockchain is coming to disrupt your industry. Deloitte University Press. 1-27. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/signals-for-strategists/trends-blockchain-bitcoin-security-transparency.html
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Don, T., & Alex, T. (2016). BLOCKCHAIN REVOLUTION: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin is Changing Money, Business, and the World." Park Ji-hoon, 2017. Block Chain Revolution: The Fourth Industrial Revolution Age, A Huge Technology Beyond Artificial Intelligence." Seoul: Yu Cultural History.
Go, Y, S., & Choi, H. S. (2017). Changing business paradigm and its utilization plan. KOREA SCIENCE & ART FORUM, 27, 13-29.
Hoon, J. H., & Chae, W. (2005). A Study on the Influence Factors of Government Trust: Focused on the Case of Location in Buan - Gun Nuclear Power Plant. Korean Public Administration Review, 39(3), 87-113.
Hwangju, C. (2015). The impact of e - government on the performance of public data openness. Journal of the Korean Association of Local Information Science, 18(2), 128.
Im, M. H. (2016). The Effects and Problems of Block Chain Technology. Information and Communication Technology Promotion Center. Weekly Technology Trend, December, 14, 2-13.
Joon, P., & Lee, K. H. (2017). A Study on the Security Problem of Smart TV and Consumer 's Purchase Intention. Journal of the Korean Academy of Science and Technology, 18(7), 382-393.
Kang, H. J. (2018). Block Chain Industry and Digital Contents Utilization Plan. IT Industry Promotion Agency, Issue Report, 2018-19, 1-16.
Kang, J. Y. (2017). The emergence of the block chain 2.0 and changes in financial markets. According to the survey, 742, 3-34.
Kim (2015). Block Chain Technology and Changes in Finance. KB Knowledge Vitamin, 15-91, 1-6.
Kim, D. H., Lee, J. H., & Park, Y. P. (2012). A Study on the Characteristics of Cloud Computing Affecting Intention to Introduce Cloud Computing Service. Korean Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 111-136.
Kim, E. K. (2013). Social Service Policy Analysis and Policy Issues. Korean society and administration research, 24(1), 111-136.
Kim, G. S. (2013). Analysis of Structural Equation Model. Seoul: Hanaraya Academy.
Kim, J. K., & Kim, S. H. (2014). A Study on the Influence of Relationship between Fairness and Privacy Calculation on Information Intention. Internet e-commerce research, 14(1), 45-67.
Kim, J. S. (2017). A Study on Factors Influencing the Intention of Acceptance of Block Chain Technology. Ph.D Thesis, Soongsil University, Seoul.
Kim, J. W. (2016). Development Prospects of Block Chain and Financial Institutions. BNK Financial Management Institute, 1-23.
Kim, M. D., & Hee, S. L. (2008). Determinants of Service Quality in Welfare Facilities for the Disabled. Korean Policy Science Bulletin, 12(2), 1-28.
Kim, S. H. (2012). Factors Affecting Intention to Accept Smartphone Banking Service. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 12(11), 303-312.
Kim, S. H., & Yoon, E. S. (2009). A Comparative Study on the Recognition of Welfare Services for Disabled Persons between Urban and Rural Areas. Social Science Research, 18, 41-55.
Kim, T. E. (2017). A Study on the Discrepancy between WTP and WTA and its Causes. Korean Public Administration Review, 51(4), 181-217.
Kim, Y. J. K., & Byeong, H. (2016). Privacy Paradox for providing personal information. Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 16(1), 119-151.
Lee, C. W., & Moon, J. H. (2017). A Study on the Influence of IoT Technology Characteristics on SCM Expected Performance and Intention to Introduce: Logistics Supply Chain and Distributors in China. Information Systems Review, 19(3), 1-21.
Lee, H., Ji, Y., & Jinsol (2013). A Study on Influencing Factors of Using Virtual Clustered Dynamic Collaboration Software. Information Society and Media, (26), 38-73.
Lee, M. K. (2012). Welfare services of the disabled and policy implications. Health and Welfare Forum, 188, 45-53.
Lee, S. H. (2013). Web service security enhancement plan. The Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 11(12), 361-366.
Lim, J. Y., Song, M. S., Han, Y. R., & Kim, E. J., Choi, K. W., & Sung, Y. M. (2010). A measure of the pay for a senior citizen awareness program. Korean Journal of Public Health Nursing, 24(2), 173-181.
Ministry of Health and Welfare (2017). Status of Disabled Persons (as of the end of December 2017). Retrieved from http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/jb/sjb030301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=03&MENU_ID=0321&CONT_SEQ=344589&page=1
Ministry of Science and Technology Ministry of Information and Communication (2018). Block Chain Technology Development Strategy. Retrieved from https://msit.go.kr/SYNAP/skin/doc.html?fn=eacc1db567a49ff95056834c0a82e38f&rs=/SYNAP/sn3hcv/result/201811/
Park, C. J., & Park, K. M. (2018). Analysis of Application Trends of Block Chain Technology Using Patent Information. Journal of Korea Institute of Next-generation Computing, 14(2), 72-81.
Park, I., & Ahn, H. C. (2012) A Study on User Acceptance Model of UTAUT - based Mobile Credit Card Service. e-business research, 13(3), 551-574.
Park, J. W. (2011). A study on the acceptance of public communication through smartphone. Journal of the Korea Electromagnetic Engineering Society, 6(4), 465-471.
Park, J. Y. (2017). Legal regulations on fraudulent use of social service vouchers. The Institute for Legal Studies, 34(3), 111-132.
Paul, B. (1964). ON DISTRIBUTED COMMUNICATIONS:Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION TO DISTRIBUTED COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_memoranda/2006/RM3420.pdf
Paul, V., & Michael, J. C. (2016). The Age of Cryptocurrency: How Bitcoin and the Blockchain Are Challenging the Global Economic Order. In Hyunjae, J., &Kim, Ji-yeon (Transl.), 2017, Bitcoin phenomenon, Block Chain 2.0: Virtual currency, dreaming of more than financial revolution" Seoul: The Window of the Future.
Satoshi, N. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Shin, S., & Lee, S. (2016). The Impact of Fairness Perceptions on Government Trust. Korean Public Administration Review, 50(2), 137.
Sim, S. S. (2017). A Critical Review of Disability Support System. Criticism Social policy, (56), 237-268.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Venkatesh, V., & Hillol, B. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
Venkatesh, V., Michael, G., Morris, Gordon, B., Davis, & Fred, D. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Yang, S. H., Hwang, Y., Seong, & Park, J. G. (2015). A Study on Intention to Accept New Technology. Journal of the Korean Society of Business Administration, 189-203.
Yoo, H. S. (2008). Status and Factors of Welfare Services for the Disabled. Rehabilitation Welfare, 12(1), 1-17.
Yoo, S. D. (2018). Block Chain Ecosystem Studies. The Journal of The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication (IIBC), 18(2), 1-9.
Yoo, S. M. (2017). Policy Directions for Block Chain. Information and Communication Policy Institute, 29(15), 1-25.
Yoon, S. Y. (2012). Analysis of the delivery system of the welfare service for the disabled and developmental alternative. Journal of Life Science Research, 16(1), 35-50.
Yoon, S. Y. (2015). The Actual Conditions of Use of Welfare Services for the Disabled and Policy Tasks. Health and Welfare Forum, 226, 50-60.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).