Mechanisms and Paths for Realizing the Value of Karst Ecological Products in Hebei Province

  • Yue Fu School of Karst Science, State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China
  • Kangning Xiong School of Karst Science, State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China
  • Jiawang Yan School of Karst Science, State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification Control, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China
  • Yu Zhang Department of Resource Management, Tangshan Normal University, Tangshan, China
Keywords: karst, ecological product, value realization, ecological protection and restoration

Abstract

The northern karst region is an important area for the implementation of China's sustainable development strategy, and at the same time, it is also an area with extremely fragile ecological environment and concentrated distribution of soil erosion, but the research on the mechanisms and paths of realizing the value of ecological products in the northern karst region has been less involved. Taking the Zunhua study area in Hebei and the Wolf Tooth Mountain study area as an example, we constructed an ecological product value accounting index system based on different types of ecosystems and quantitatively analyzed the GEP of the two study areas. The results show that the GEP of Zunhua study area in Hebei Province in 2022 is 76.575 million yuan, of which the value of regulating services is the highest, accounting for 93.89 % of the total value of GEP; the value of cultural services is the lowest, accounting for 0.41 % of the total value of GEP; and the value of material services accounts for 5.70 % of the total value of GEP. In 2022, the GEP of the Langyashan Study Area in Hebei Province was 122,408,000 yuan, with the highest value of regulating services, accounting for 89 % of the total value of the GEP; the lowest value of material goods, accounting for 1 % of the total value of the GEP; and the value of cultural services, which accounted for 10 % of the GEP. suggests that the regulating services provided by ecosystems in the two study areas contribute the most to human well-being and are the most significant components of the GEP. And closely around the karst ecological products value accounting, value realization mechanism and path of basic cutting-edge research for the whole chain design, integrated deployment, module to promote systematic research, for the northern karst ecological restoration areas and ecological protection areas to practice the theory of the “two mountains”, to promote the formation and optimization of the ecological industry, and to promote the revitalization of the countryside to provide scientific references. Scientific reference.

References

Cao, X. J. (2011). Valuation of multi-function of farmland ecosystem: Take Jiangsu province as example. Nanjing Agricultural University.
Chen, Z. Y. (2023). Study on the path of green organic agricultural and livestock products management and development in Qinghai Province. Tibetan Plateau Forum, 11(01), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-5219.2023.01.006
Gao, H. D., Li, Z. B., Li, P., et al. (2015). The capacity of soil loss control in the Loess Plateau based on soil erosion control degree. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(09), 1503–1515. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201509012
Gao, X. L., Lin, Y. Q., Xu, W. H., et al. (2020). Research progress on the value realization of ecological products. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201807211563
Ge, Y. (2017). Research on the net carbon sink of farmland ecosystem and its compensation mechanism in Yunnan Province. Kunming University of Science and Technology.
Gu, S. Z., Yang, Y., Li, W. M., et al. (2020). Analysis on the “Two Mountains” and models and policy tools for their mutual transformation. Environment and Sustainable Development, 45(06), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.19758/j.cnki.issn1673-288x.202006075
Ji, P. C. (2018). Speed up to better the river basin ecological compensation mechanism in China. Macroeconomic Management, (10), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.19709/j.cnki.11-3199/f.2018.10.009
Li, Q. (2018). Increasing the supply of ecological products and fostering new drivers of green development. Ecological Economy, 34(08), 209–211+225.
Li, S. N. (2015). Research on accounting for the value of farmland ecosystem services in Qixi County. China University of Geosciences.
Li, Y. P. (2019). The regional soil erosion evaluation method and application based on RS/GIS: A case study of the Key Ecological Function Zone in Dabie Mountains of Henan Province. Henan Polytechnic University.
Liu, X. M., Wang, Y., & Tao, P. J. (2023). Research on the accounting of ecosystem service value based on land use: Taking Hebei Province as an example. Agriculture and Technology, 43(14), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.19754/j.nyyjs.20230730022
Liu, Z. Y., Li, Z., & Zhang, Q. J. (2019). The realization and enlightenment of the value of the ecological products of the Three-River-Source National Park. Macroeconomic Management, (02), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.19709/j.cnki.11-3199/f.2019.02.013
Macroeconomic Research Institute, N. L. I. G., Jia, R. X., & Gao, G. L. (2015). Practices and suggestions for horizontal ecological compensation. Macroeconomic Management, (02), 46–49.
Ouyang, Z. Y., Wang, X. K., & Miao, H. (1999). A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economy. Acta Ecologica Sinica, (05), 19–25.
Wang, J. F., & Hou, C. B. (2013). Study on implementation framework and compensation pattern of basin ecological compensation mechanism in China: From the perspective of compensation funds source. China Population, Resources and Environment, 23(02), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2013.02.004
Wang, L. Y., Xiao, Y., Ouyang, Z. Y., et al. (2017). Gross ecosystem product accounting in the national key ecological function area: An example of Arxan. China Population, Resources and Environment, 27(03), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2017.03.018
Xiang, B. H., & Zeng, Y. Z. (2017). Ecotourism construction and operating mechanism in the Sanjiangyuan National Park System Pilot Area, China. Resources Science, 39(01), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.18402/resci.2017.01.06
Yang, H. R. (2015). Research on carbon sources and sinks and impact factors of farmland ecosystem in Weifang. Northeast Forestry University.
Yu, H. Y., Zhang, L. B., Li, D. Q., et al. (2020). Practical experience and enlightenment of value implementation of ecological products. Research of Environmental Sciences, 33(3), 685–690. https://doi.org/10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2019.08.13
Zhang, L. B., Yu, H. Y., Li, D. Q., et al. (2019). Connotation and value implementation mechanism of ecological products. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 50(6), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2019.06.019
Zhang, W. M. (2020). Improve the mechanism for realizing the value of ecological products: A survey on Fujian Forest Ecology Bank. Macroeconomic Management, (03), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.19709/j.cnki.11-3199/f.20200326.006
Published
2025-02-19
Section
Articles