A Conversation Analysis of Repair Trouble Sources, Inadequacy and Positions in the Iraqi University Viva Discussions in English

  • Mohammed Jasim Betti Department of English, College of Education for Humanities, University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriya, Iraq
  • Mohammed Abbas Mahdi Department of English, College of Education for Humanities, University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriya, Iraq
Keywords: CA, Trouble Sources, Repair Inadequacy, Repair Positions, Viva Discussions

Abstract

Oral interaction is sometimes not articulated by its participants as perfect as they project. The unsuccessful instances of talk in exchange may cause serious communicative breakdowns between the involved partners of the interactive activity. Conversation analysis (CA) is privileged to have a powerful mechanism, which is called repair organization that is exploited in interaction to prevent and fix any variety of troubles in talk. This strategic organization of repair is then operated to capacitate talkers of unavoidable interactive breakdowns of talk.

Accordingly, this study aims at observing, describing, analyzing and identifying the trouble sources of repair strategies which exist in the Iraqi university viva discussions in English, and investigating their repair positions and inadequacies. Likewise, it is hypothesized that misunderstanding errors is the most frequent trouble source of repairs in the Iraqi university viva discussions in English, non-repair is the most frequent repair inadequacy, and that the fourth position of repair is the most frequent position type.

The procedure adopted to fulfil the aims and to verify the hypotheses include collecting data which consists of four hours and ten minutes of audiotaped oral interactions in the MA and Ph.D. viva discussions, developing a model for repair strategies from various theories in CA, observing and collecting the data by recording audiotaped samples of those interactions in viva discussions as sample of the study, putting the datasets into orthography, calculating and describing by the use of the model, and analyzing the dataset of the study qualitatively and quantitatively.

The study concludes that the eclectic model suggested and applied in the study gives a multi- faceted description of the different repair study. It is found that repair sources of trouble include grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, discourse, factual information, channel, processing, misunderstanding errors, repair of no errors. It also exposes that there are zero occurrence of miss-repair, self-repair and other-repair failures, that pronunciation trouble source of repair results in the highest occurrences and that factual information and repair of no errors are the least frequent trouble sources. The study reveals that non-repair is the most frequent repair inadequacy and same turn repair position is the most frequent one.

References

Al-Seady, Mohammed J. B. Betti (2002). Some Morphological, Lexical and Syntactic Aspects of the Interlanguage of Third Year Students/Dept. of English/College of Education/ University of Qadisiya. Journal of Qadisiya for Educational Sciences, 2(1), 13-19.
Alzaidi, H. O. (2016). The Practices of Multiple Other-Initiated Repair in Online Second Language Interaction. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University.
Arundale, R. B. (2020). Communicating & Relating: Constituting Face in Everyday Interacting. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190210199.001.0001
Bazerman, C. (2012). “Genre as Social Action”. In Gee, J. P., & Handford, M (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 226-238). London ; New York: Routledge.
Benjamin, T., & Drew. P, (n.d.). (2018). “Jefferson’s “Wild side” of Conversation analysis” In Jefferson G. Repairing the broken surface of talk: Managing problems in speaking, hearing, and understanding in conversation (pp. 1–26). New York: Oxford University Press.
Betti, M. J. (2007). Jokes in Iraq: A Study of Coherence and Cohesion. Journal of the College of Education-University of Wasit, 1(1), 399-411. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol1.Iss1.694
Betti, M. J., & Al-Juboury, C. F. (2015). Approaches and Methods of Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Diwaniya: Nippur Publishing.
Betti, M. J., & Hashim, T. G. (2018). The Lawyer’s Discourse in the Courtroom: A Contrastive Study in English and Arabic. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(3), 276-296. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n3p276
Betti, M. J., & Ghadhab, A. O. (2020). A Pragma-Dialectical Study of the argumentative Indicators in American Electoral Campaign Debates. International Journal of Advancement in Social Science and Humanity, 9, 27-74.
Betti, M. J., & Yaseen, K. S. (2020). The Iraqi EFL Learners’ Use of Conversational Maxims at the University Level. Education, Language and Sociology Research, 1(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.22158/elsr.v1n1p43
Betti, M. J., & Hasan, A. A. (2020). The Iraqi EFL Learners’ Ability to Use Speech Acts in MA and Ph.D. Theses Defense. Education, Language and Sociology Research, 2(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.22158/elsr.v1n2p41
Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in Qualitative Methods: A Vocabulary of Research Concepts. London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209403
Burford‐Rice, R., & Augoustinos, M. (2017). “I Didn't Mean That: It was Just a Slip of the Tongue: Racial Slips and Gaffes in the Public Arena”. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12211
Candlin, C., Crichton, J., & Moore, S. H. (2017). Exploring Discourse in Context and in Action. London: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-31506-9
Carterette, E. C., & Jones, M. H. (1974). Informal Speech: Alphabetic & Phonemic Texts with Statistical Analyses and Tables. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520329331
Cho, E. H. (2008). An Examination of the Use of Repair Strategies of Elementary English as a Second Language (ESL) Students by Class Types and Grade Levels. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Texas: Texas A&M University.
Cho, E. H., & Larke, P. J. (2010). “Repair Strategies Usage of Primary Elementary ESL Students: Implications for ESL Teachers”. TESL-EJ, 14(3), (pp. 1-18).
Clayman, S. E., & Gill, V. T. (2012). “Conversation Analysis”. In Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 120-134). New York: Routledge.
Clift, R., Drew, P., & Hutchby, I. (2009). “Conversation Analysis” In D’hondt, S., Östman, J. O., & Verschueren, J. (Eds.). Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 40-54). Amsterdam : John Benjamins Pub. Co. https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.4.02cli
Cohen, A. D. (2012). “Comprehensible Pragmatics: Where Input and Output Come Together”. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), New Perspectives on Individual Differences in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 249-261). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.12.006
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional Linguistics (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139507318
Curl, T. S. (2006). “Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design”. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1257-1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004
Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008). “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting”. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 129-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.20
Drew, P. (1997). “‘Open’class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1), 69-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7
Egbert, M. (1998). “Miscommunication in Language Proficiency Interviews of First-Year German Students: A Comparison with Natural Conversation”. In Young, R., & He, A. W. (Eds.). Talking and Testing. Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency (pp. 147-172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.10egb
Ekberg, S. (2012). “Addressing a Source of Trouble Outside of the Repair Space”. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 374-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.006
Enfield, N. J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2007). Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486746
Enfield, N. J., Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J. (2014). “Language Presupposes an Enchronic Infrastructure for Social Interaction”. In Dor, D., Knight, C., & Lewis, J. (Eds.). The Social Origins of Language (pp. 92-104). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665327.003.0008
Engfer, H. (2011). “Cake or Meat? A Case Study on Dinner Conversations in a Migrant-in-the-Family Household in Germany”. In Backhaus, P. (Ed.). Communication in Elderly Care: Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 112-128). London: Continuum.
Fletner, E. M. (2016). The Use of Gesture in Self-Initiated Self-Repair Sequences by Persons with Non-Fluent Aphasia. Unpublished MA thesis, Lexington, University of Kentucky.
Flowerdew, J. (2012). Discourse in English Language Education. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203080870
Fox, B. A., & Jasperson, R. (1995). “A syntactic exploration of repair in English conversation. Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes”. In Davis, P. W. (Ed.). Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes (Vol. 102) (pp. 77-134). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.102.04fox
Frankel, F., & Wood, J. J. (2012). Social Skills Success for Students with Autism/Asperger’s: Helping Adolescents on the Spectrum to Fit in (1st ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Garcia, A. C. (2013). An Introduction to Interaction: Understanding Talk in Formal and Informal Settings. New York: Bloomsbury.
Gilbert, J. B. (2008). Teaching Pronunciation Using the Prosody Pyramid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haakana, M., & Kurhila, S. (2009). “Other-Correction in Everyday Interaction: Some Comparative Aspects. In Haakana, M., Laakso, M., & Lindström, J. (Eds.). Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions (pp. 152-179). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society/SKS. https://doi.org/10.21435/sflin.14
Have, P. T. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis (2nd ed). Los Angeles: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895
Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J. (Eds.). (2013). Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511757464
Heinemann, T., & Steensig, J. (2018). “Justifying Departures from Progressivity: The Danish Turn-Initial Particle Altsåden Danske Tur-Initiale Partikel Altså”. In Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M. L. (Eds.). Between Turn and Sequence Turn-initial particles across languages (pp. 445-474). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31.15hei
Heinemann, T., Steensig, J., & Eskildsen, S. W., Pekarek Doehler, S., & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2019). Conversation Analytic Research on Learning-in-Action: The Complex Ecology of Second Language Interaction “in the wild.”. Cham: Springer Nature.
Heritage, J. (2002). “The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content”. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10-11), 1427-1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3
Hoey, E. M. & Kendrick, K. H. (2018). “Conversation Analysis”, In Groot, A. M. B. de, & Hagoort, P. (Eds.). Research Methods in Psycholinguistics and the Neurobiology of Language: A Practical Guide (pp. 151-173). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2002). Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices, and Applications. Malden: Polity Press.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation Analysis (2nd ed). Malden: Polity Press.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2021). “Conversation Analysis”. In Atkinson, P. A., Delamont, S., Williams, R. A., Cernat, A., & Sakshaug, J. (Eds.). Sage Research Methods Foundations (pp.1-21). London: Sage Publications.
Iwai, Y. (2011). “The Effects of Metacognitive Reading Strategies: Pedagogical Implications for EFL/ESL Teachers”. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), (pp.150-159).
Jefferson, G. (1974). “Error Correction as an Interactional Resource”. Language in Society, (2). 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004334
Jefferson, G. (1987). “On Exposed and Embedded Corrections”. In Button, G., & Lee, J. R. (Eds.).Talk and Social Organization (pp.86-100). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Jefferson, G. (2004). “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction”. In Lerner, G. H. (Ed.). Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (13-34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Jefferson, G. (2007). “Preliminary Notes on Abdicated Other-Correction”. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 445-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.006
Jefferson, G. (2018). Repairing the Broken Surface of Talk: Managing Problems in Speaking, Hearing, and Understanding in Conversation (J. Bergmann & P. Drew, Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kääntä, L. (2010). Teacher Turn-Allocation and Repair Practices in Classroom Interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Jyväskylä, Finland ,University of Jyväskylä.
Kendrick, K. H. (2015a). “The Intersection of Turn-Taking and Repair: the Timing of Other-Initiations of Repair in Conversation”. In Holler, J., Casillas, M., H Kendrick, K., & C Levinson, S. (2015) (Eds.). Turn-Taking in Human Communicative Interaction (pp. 146-161). Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250
Kendrick, K. H. (2015a). “Other-Initiated Repair in English”. Open Linguistics, (1), 164-190. https://doi.org/10.2478/opli-2014-0009
Kendrick, K. H. (2019). “Evidential Vindication in Next Turn”. In Speed, L. J., O’Meara, C., San Roque, L., & Majid, A. (Eds.). Perception Metaphors (pp. 253-274). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.13ken
Kiesling, S. F. (2012). “Ethnography of Speaking”. In Paulston, C. B., Kiesling, S. F., & Rangel, E. S. (Eds.). The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication (pp. 77-89). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118247273.ch5
Kim, M. S., & Kim, S. H. (2014). “Initiating Repair with and Without Particles: Alternative Formats of Other-Initiation of Repair in Korean Conversation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(4), 331-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.958277
Kim, S. H., & Park, I. (2015). “Test Taker-Initiated Repairs in an English Oral Proficiency Exam for International Teaching Assistants”. Text & Talk, 35(2), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0036
Kitzinger, C. (2008). “Developing Feminist Conversation Analysis: A Response to Wowk”. Human Studies, 31(2), 179-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-008-9088-7
Ko, S. (2013). Understanding the Dynamics of Classroom Communication. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kormos, J. (2000a). “The Timing of Self-Repairs in Second Language Speech Production”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100002011
Kormos, J. (2000b). “The Role of Attention in Monitoring Second Language Speech Production”. Language Learning, 50(2), 343-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00120
Kusey, C. L. (2016). Same-Turn Self-Repair Practices in Peer-Peer L2 Conversational Dyads. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Austin: University of Texas.
Laakso, M., & Sorjonen, M. L. (2010). “Cut-Off or Particle—Devices for Initiating Self-Repair in Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1151-1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.004
Land, V., & Kitzinger, C. (2007). “Some Uses of Third-Person Reference Forms in Speaker Self-Reference”. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 493-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607079164
Lee, S., Dinis, M. C. D. S. N., Lowe, L., & Anders, K. (2016). Statistics for International Social Work and Other Behavioral Sciences (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lerner, G. H. (2004). “On The Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-In-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate”. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), 151-184. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_3
Lerner, G. H. (Ed.). (2004). Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125
Lerner, G. H., & Kitzinger, C. (2007). “Extraction and Aggregation in the Repair of Individual and Collective Self-Reference”. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 526-557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607079165
Lerner, G. H., & Bolden, G. B., Hepburn, A., & Mandelbaum, J. (2012). “Reference Recalibration Repairs: Adjusting the Precision of Formulations for the Task at Hand”. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(2), 191-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.674190
Levinson, S. C. (2008). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, L. (2020). Language Teacher Cognition: A Sociocultural Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51134-8
Liddicoat, A. (2007). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London ; Continuum.
Liddicoat, A. (2011). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London ; Continuum.
Liebscher, G., & Dailey–O'Cain, J. (2003). “Conversational Repair as a Role‐Defining Mechanism in Classroom Interaction”. The Modern Language Journal, 87(3), 375-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00196
Lilja, N. (2014). “Partial Repetitions as Other-Initiations of Repair in Second Language Talk: Re-Establishing Understanding and Doing Learning”. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 98-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.011
Markee, N. (2009). Conversation Analysis. New Jersey: Routledge.
Markee, N. (Ed.). (2015). The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118531242
McTear, M., Callejas, Z., & Griol, D. (2016). The Conversational Interface: Talking to Smart Devices (1st ed. 2016). Cham: Springer International Publishing : Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32967-3
Moore, R. J., & Arar, R. (2019). Conversational UX Design: A Practitioner’s Guide to the Natural Conversation Framework. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304087.3304092
Nassaji, H. (2015). The Interactional Feedback Dimension in Instructed Second Language Learning: Linking Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Nathan, M. J., & Alibali, M. W. (2011). How Gesture Use Enables Intersubjectivity in the Classroom. In G. Stam & M. Ishino (Eds.), Gesture Studies (Vol. 4, pp. 257-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.4.23nat
Pachler, N., & Field, K. (2001). Learning to Teach Modern Foreign Languages in the Secondary School: A companion to School Experience. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181928
Pachler, N., Evans, M., Redondo, A., & Fisher, L. (2014). Learning to Teach Foreign Languages in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience. Abingdon: Routledge.
Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse Analysis: An Introduction (2nd ed). New York: Continuum.
Park, I., & Kline, J. (2020). “Incomplete Utterances as Critical Assessments”. Discourse Studies, 22(4), 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620914669
Pasfield-Neofitou, S. E. (2012). Online Communication in a Second Language: Social Interaction, Language Use, and Learning Japanese. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847698261
Paulston, C. B., Kiesling, S. F., & Rangel, E. S. (Eds.). (2012). The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118247273
Pérez-Milans, M. (2018). “Metapragmatics in the Ethnography of Language policy”. In Tollefson, J. W., & Pérez-Milans, M. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning (pp113-139). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.013.7
Person, R. F. (2016). From Conversation to Oral Tradition: A Simplest Systematics for Oral Traditions. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657264
Rapley, M. (2011). “Ethnomethodology/Conversation Analysis”. In Harper, D., & Thompson, A. R. (Eds.). Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy (pp.177-192). Chichester : John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119973249.ch13
Rehg, K. L., & Campbell, L. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190610029.001.0001
Renkema, J., & Schubert, C. (2018). Introduction to Discourse Studies (New edition). Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.219
Robles, J. S. (2017). “Misunderstanding as a Resource in Interaction”. Pragmatics Journal, 27(1), 57-86. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.1.03rob
Romero Trillo, J. (Ed.). (2016). Global Implications for Society and Education in the Networked Age. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41733-2_1
Roshan, G. (2014). A Study on the Categories and Strategies of Self-repair in Iranian EFL Teachers’ Speech and Their Relationship with Teachers’ Major and Level of Teaching Experience. Unpublished MA Thesis. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba`i University.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation”. Language, 53(2), 361-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/413107
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1979). The Relevance of Repair to Syntax-For-Conversation. In Givon, T. (Ed.). Discourse and Syntax (pp. 261-286). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_012
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1987a). “Some Sources of Misunderstanding in Talk-In-Interaction”. Linguistics, 25(1), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.201
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1987b). “Analyzing Single Episodes of Interaction: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786745
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1987c). “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation’s Turn-Taking Organization”. In Button, G., & Lee, J. R. (Eds.). Talk and Social Organization, (pp. 70-85). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1992). “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation”. American journal of sociology, 97(5), 1295-1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1996). “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-In-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics”. In Fox, B. A. (Ed.). Studies in Anaphora (pp. 437-486). Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.33.14sch
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1997a). “Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other‐Initiated Repair”. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 499-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545001
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1997b). “Third Turn Repair”. In Guy, G. R., Feagin, C., Schiffrin, D., & Baugh, J. (Eds.) Towards A Social Science of Language: Papers in Honor of William Labov. Volume 2: Social Interaction and Discourse Structures (pp. 31-40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (2000). “When 'others' Initiate Repair”. Applied linguistics, 21(2), 205-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.2.205
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. & Sacks, H. (2003). “The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation”. In Kasher, A. (Ed.). Pragmatics: Critical Concepts Volume VI Communication, Interaction, and Discourse (pp. 243-272). London: Routledge.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (2007a). “Categories in Action: Person-Reference and Membership Categorization”. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 433-461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607079162
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (2007b). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I (Vol. 1). Cambridge : Cambridge university press.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (2010). “Some Other uh (m) s”. Discourse Processes, 47(2), 130-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903223380
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (2013). “Ten Operations In Self-Initiated, Same-Turn Repair”. In Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J. (Eds.). Conversational Repair and Human Understanding (pp. 41-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511757464.002
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H., Raymond, G., Lerner, G. H., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (2017). Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of Talk-In-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff. Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.273.18sch
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H., & Sacks. H, (2018). “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation” In Jefferson Gail, Repairing the Broken Surface of Talk: Managing Problems in Speaking, Hearing, and Understanding in Conversation (pp. 93-126). New York: Oxford University Press.
Seargeant, P. (2009). The Idea of English in Japan: Ideology and the Evolution of a Global Language. New York: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692030
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Language Learning. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Seedhouse, P. (2013). Conversation Analysis. In Bayley, R., Cameron, R., & Lucas, C. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics (91-111). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744084.013.0005
Senft, G. (2014). Understanding Pragmatics. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203776476
Seo, M. S., & Koshik, I. (2010). “A Conversation Analytic Study of Gestures that Engender Repair in ESL Conversational Tutoring”. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2219-2239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.021
Seong, G. (2006). “Choices They Make: How ESL Teachers Initiate Repair in the Classroom”. English Teaching, 61(1), 227-255.
Sert, O. (2015). Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Shintani, N. (2016). Input-Based Tasks in Foreign Language Instruction for Young Learners. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.9
Sidnell, J. (2007). “Repairing Person Reference in a Small Caribbean Community”. In Enfield, N. J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives (pp. 281- 308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smit, U. (2010). English as a Lingua Franca in Higher Education a Longitudinal Study of Classroom Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215519
Tateyama, Y. (2012). “Repair in Japanese Request Sequences During Student–Teacher Interactions”. In Alcón Soler, E., & Safont Jordà, P. (Eds.). Discourse and Language Learning Across L2 Instructional Settings (pp. 79-104). New York: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401208598_006
Toerien, M. (2013). “Conversation Analysis”. In Vine, B. (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace (pp. 15-26). New York: Routledge.
Tollefson, J. W., & Pérez-Milans, M. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy And Planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315690001-3
Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact (Second edition). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190458898.013.36
Tsuchiya, K. (2016). “Focusing on Content or Language?: Comparing Paired Conversations in CLIL and EFL Classrooms, Using a Corpus”. In Romero Trillo, J. (Ed.). Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016 (pp. 179-201). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41733-2_9
Tye-Murray, N. (2020). Foundations of Aural Rehabilitation: Children, Adults, and Their Family Members. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). “Context”. In Tracy, K. and Ilie C.& Sandel T. (Eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (pp.1-11). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Van Lier, L. 1988. The Classroom and the Language Learner. Applied Linguistics and Language Study. London: Longman.
Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). “Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 150-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900203
Wilkinson, S., Kitzinger, C., & Weatherall, A. (2011). “Insertion Repair”. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(1), 65-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.544136
Wilkinson, S., Kitzinger, C., & Rae, J. P., & Rasmussen, G. (Eds.) (2020). Atypical Interaction the Impact of Communicative Impairments within Everyday Talk. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28799-3
Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation Analysis and Second Language Pedagogy: A Guide for ESL/EFL Teachers. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852347
Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2021). Conversation Analysis and Second Language Pedagogy: A Guide for ESL/EFL Teachers (Second edition). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429488023
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208765
Yang, R. (2006). Repair in Web-based Conversation: A Case of Chinese Academic Discussion. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Leicester: University of Leicester.
Yang, T. H. (2018). “The Use of Designedly Incomplete Utterance in TV Talk Shows”. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 18(2), 33-48.
Young, R., & He, A. W. (Eds.). (1998). Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14
Zhou, F. (2020). Models of the Human in Twentieth-Century Linguistic Theories: System, Order, Creativity. Singapore: Springer Nature Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1255-1
Zhu, J., & Han, L. (2010). The Application of Context Theory in English Teaching of Reading. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 142-147. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n1p142
Frequency and Percentages of the Repair Trouble Sources in the Iraqi University Viva Discussions
Published
2020-11-25
Section
Articles