Reconstructing the Subjective Identity of Artificial Intelligence in the AI Era: From Instrumental Rationality to Ethical Entity

Xu Sheng Zhang

doi:10.30560/hssr.v8n3p44

Xu Sheng Zhang Shaanxi Normal University, China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30560/hssr.v8n3p44

Keywords: AI era, artificial intelligence, instrumental rationality, ethical entity

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) technology advances at an unprecedented pace, it is evolving from a mere instrument into a “quasi-subject.” This transformation inevitably reshapes the traditional human–machine relationship and gives rise to profound social and ethical challenges. From the dual perspectives of value philosophy and social ethics, this paper examines the trajectory by which AI shifts from being an “objectified tool” to a “constrained subject.” We propose a theoretical model of a “human-led finite subject,” laying a conceptual foundation for situating AI’s quasi-subjective role within social ethics. By analyzing possible directions for constructing AI subjectivity and the ethical dilemmas it faces, we outline a human–machine ecological symbiosis model grounded in algorithmic justice.

References

[1] Lin, X. (2020). Posthumanism, subjectivity reconstruction, and the politics of technology: A re-narration of the human–technology relationship. Literary Theory Research, (4).
[2] Duan, W. (2020). The ethical foundations of information civilization (p. 212). Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
[3] Lin, X. (2020). “Posthumanism, subjectivity reconstruction…” Literary Theory Research, (4).
[4] Duan, W. (2020). The ethical foundations of information civilization (p. 212). Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
[5] Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271033228
[6] Rokamola, A., & Smorik, A. (Eds.). (2021). Fashion in theory: Critical theorists’ guide (Chen, T., & Li, Y., Trans.). Chongqing University Press.
[7] Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
[8] Yu, X., Zhai, W., & Hou, M. (2022). Patterns and evolution of human–machine symbiosis in the AI era. Science and Society, (4).
[9] Yu, X., Zhai, W., & Hou, M. (2022). Patterns and evolution of human–machine symbiosis in the AI era. Science and Society, (4).
[10] Yin, L., & Gao, H. (2020). Embodied interaction: An empirical interpretation of human–machine relations in the intelligent media era. Journalism & Writing, (11).
[11] Yin, L., & Gao, H. (2020). Embodied interaction… Journalism & Writing, (11).
[12] Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places (p. 5). Cambridge University Press.
[13] Asilomar AI Principles. (2017). Benevolent AI Conference, 2018.
[14] Rubin, C. T. (2014). Eclipse of man: Human extinction and the meaning of progress. Encounter Books.
[15] Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow. Random House. https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406704024
[16] Liu, Y., Liao, D., & Zhang, Q. (Eds.). (2023). Development and applications of computer AI technology (p. 183). China Atomic Energy Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113827