Audience Labor in Chinese Social Media: A Case Study of Film Reviewers on Douban
Abstract
With the rapid development of internet technologies, the new media industry has swept into people’s lives at an astonishing pace, bringing about significant changes in global labor relations. Drawing on the theory of digital labor, this article examines audiences within China’s social media by focusing on film reviewers on Douban as a case study. It reconstructs the labor process involved in writing film reviews and explores the issue of autonomy within this context. The study finds that while using Douban, film reviewers invest substantial time and effort into producing cultural content for the platform. In this process, although they appear to possess a certain degree of autonomy and choice, film reviewers are in fact subject to platform control and exploitation. They are often compelled to navigate a delicate balance between adhering to platform rules and asserting their individual agency.
References
[2] Sandoval, M., Fuchs, C., Prodnik, J. A., Sevignani, S., & Allmer, T. (2014). Introduction: Philosophers of the World Unite! Theorising Digital Labor and Virtual Work-Definitions, Dimensions, and Forms. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism and Critique, 12(2), 464–467. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i2.622
[3] Sandoval, M. (2013). Foxconned labor as the dark side of the information age: Working conditions at Apple’s contract manufacturers in China. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 11(2), 318–347. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v11i2.481
[4] Fuchs, C. (2015). Digital labor: A comment on César Bolaño’s tripleC reflection. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 13(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v13i1.675
[5] Chen, Y. (2014). Production Cultures and Differentiations of Digital Labor. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(2), 648–667. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i2.547
[6] Nixon, B. (2016). The old media business in the new: ‘The Googlization of everything’ as the capitalization of digital consumption. Media, Culture & Society, 38(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715594036
[7] Chen, X. M. (2000). Qualitative research methods and social science research. Education Science Press.
[8] Zhang, G., & Lei, L. (2012). Current status and prospects of online research methods. Psychological Research, 5(3), 20–25.
[9] Nygren, G., Dobek-Ostrowska, B., & Anikina, M. (2015). Professional autonomy. Nordicom Review, 36, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0018
[10] Sjøvaag, H. (2013). Journalistic Autonomy. Between Structure, Agency and Institution. Nordicom Review, 34, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2013-0111
[11] Brown, B. (2014). Will work for free: The biopolitics of unwaged digital labor. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(2), 694–712. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i2.538
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
1.png)
