Housing in China: Institutional Cornerstone and Demographic Shackle for Family Formation

Cai Zhengrong; Rusmawati Binti Said

doi:10.30560/hssr.v8n4p131

Cai Zhengrong School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
Rusmawati Binti Said School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30560/hssr.v8n4p131

Keywords: housing system, family development, population change, policy interaction, support function

Abstract

China's housing system has undergone profound changes, and its core function has transcended its mere residential attributes, it has become a key institutional foundation for shaping family structure and population development. With the advancement of urbanization and marketization, housing not only serves as the material space for families but also deeply influences social foundations such as intergenerational support and marriage and childbearing decisions. However, the current housing system is increasingly at odds with the rapidly changing trends of family downsizing, low birth rates, and an aging population, as well as diverse housing needs. Rising housing costs, structural gaps in affordable housing, and institutional barriers are quietly transforming into significant obstacles that inhibit family formation and development and exacerbate population structure contradictions. It is imperative to examine their deep-seated impacts and optimization directions from the perspective of institutional interdependence.

References

[1] Sun, W., & Zhang, X. (2025). Spatio-Temporal Variation in Housing Wealth Inequality Among Urban Households in China. China Real Estate Finance, (2), 10–19.
[2] Chen, J. (2025). Basic Principles and Key Points of the Relationship Between Market and Security in the Housing Supply System. Social Sciences Frontline, (4), 11–20.
[3] Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Public Security, Ministry of Civil Affairs, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, People's Bank of China, & All-China Federation of Trade Unions. (2025). Opinion on Further Strengthening the Service and Protection of Migrant Workers Issued by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of Civil Affairs, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, the People's Bank of China, and the All-China Federation of Trade Unions. Gazette of the State Council of the People's Republic of China, (4), 66–68.
[4] Huang, K., & Yang, D. (2024). From Housing Construction to Community Development: A Re-examination of China's Urban Development Model. Urban Architecture, 21(24), 34–39.
[5] Han, A., & Gao, H. (2024). The Evolution and Effectiveness Analysis of China's Affordable Housing Policy and Lessons from Singapore's HDB Mechanism: Reform Recommendations from a Policy Tool Perspective. Shanghai Real Estate, (12), 10–14.