Principles for the Standardized Handling of Digital Property Inheritance
Abstract
The emergence of digital property has sparked another revolution in the expansion of the objects of rights, gradually becoming an important component of citizens' legitimate property. Ensuring the inheritance of digital heritage is an inherent requirement for realizing citizens' digital property rights. However, due to the characteristics of digital heritage-such as the intangibility of its objects, the diversity of its forms, and the complexity of its rights-it poses challenges to the existing inheritance system.The main problems facing digital heritage inheritance are the unclear legal status of digital heritage, the difficulties in applying traditional inheritance models, and the conflicts of rights inherent in digital heritage itself. Digital heritage inheritance should adopt a typological approach, categorizing digital heritage into three types based on their different characteristics: personality rights-based, property rights-based, and composite rights-based. Different types of heritage inheritance should adhere to principled methods of handling, including the principle of party autonomy, the principle of value hierarchy, the principle of proportionality, and the principle of division of rights, all of which are innovatively applied in the context of digital property. A forward-looking legal framework for digital heritage inheritance should define the legal status of digital heritage, establish inheritance principles, and clarify the obligations of third-party platforms. Digital heritage inheritance also requires the coordinated efforts of a digital heritage trustee system, technical protection and regulatory systems, and international cooperation mechanisms. The realization of digital heritage inheritance is not only a necessary condition for safeguarding citizens' legitimate property rights, but also an important component for promoting economic development in the digital age. Effective digital heritage inheritance and reasonable distribution not only ensure the comprehensive protection of citizens' property rights, but also serve as an important indicator of the level of legal civilization in society.
References
Parry, R. (2010). The practice of digital heritage and the heritage of digital practice. In Museums in a digital age (Vol. 10, p. 1).
Sun, J. (2024). The reconstruction of traditional property rights theory by digital property rights. Chinese Journal of Law, (5), 130.
J., A. (2005). Virtual property. Boston University Law Review, 85(4), 1047–1085.
Blazer, C. (2006). The following five indicia are associated with virtual property. Pierce Law Review, 5, 137–150.
Ajemian v. Yahoo!, Inc., 478 Mass. 169, 84 N.E.3d 766 (2017).
Deusch, (2018). Der digitale Nachlass vor dem BGH und die Praxisfolgen. Zeitschrift für Erbrecht und Vermögensnachfolge, (11), 687–689.
Steiner, H., & Holzer, T. (2015). Praktische Empfehlungen zum digitalen Nachlass. Zeitschrift für Erbrecht und Vermögensnachfolge, (11), 262–263.
Resta, P. (2018). Personal data and digital assets after death: A comparative law perspective on the BGH Facebook ruling. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 7(5), 201–203.
Mährke-Sobolewski, K. (2015). Digitaler Nachlass-Erbenschutz trotz Datenschutz. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 120(52), 3473.
Sorge, K. (2018). Digitaler Nachlass als Knäuel von Rechtsverhältnissen, Multimedia und Recht. Multimedia und Recht, 6, 372–377.
Lin, X. (2009). On the nature of virtual property rights. Chinese Journal of Law, (1), 88–98.
Peng, C., & Li, J. (2024). The private law framework for the protection of personal rights of the deceased in China. Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, (4), 6–19.
Liu, Y., & Tang, Y. (2023). A conceptual framework for digital inheritance under the perspective of new rights. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Social Sciences Edition), (6), 78.
Cong, X., & Qiu, L. (2023). Research on the inheritable nature of digital property. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Sciences Edition), (1), 77–85.
Zhang, D. (2013). On the inheritance of virtual network property. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (1), 35–41.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).