Genetic Variability and Heritability among Sugarcane Genotypes at Early Stage of the Advanced Selection for some Agronomic Traits in Ferké, Northern Ivory Coast

YM Béhou; CB Péné

doi:10.30560/as.v2n1p83

YM Béhou Agronomic Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, EDP/INPHB, Ivory Coast
CB Péné Research and Development Department, SUCAF-CI/SOMDIAA, Ivory Coast

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30560/as.v2n1p83

Keywords: phenotypic correlation, genotypic correlation, coefficient of variation, genetic advance, yield trait, juice quality

Abstract

Selection in sugarcane from true seed was recently implemented in Ivory Coast with the aim to increase the genetic variability of crop material used and, therefore, improve significantly sugar yields with a positive impact on the competitiveness of the Ivorian sugar industry. The objective of study was to determine the best performing cane genotypes among 29 clones tested under sprinkler irrigation, in comparison with a check variety (R579). It was carried out on R3-002 commercial sugarcane plantation of Ferké 2 sugar estate, in northern Ivory Coast. The experimental design used was a randomized complete block with 30 cane genotypes in three replications. Each plot comprised two dual rows of five meters with 0.5 and 1.90 m of inter-row spacing, i.e. 19 m² per plot and about 600 m² for the whole experiment. Based on sugar yields, four promising genotypes namely RCI12/15, RCI12/19, RCI13/121 and RCI13/136 were equivalent to the check variety which performed 15.6 t/ha. They are due to undergo the advanced selection stage during the 2020-21 cropping season for three more years for determining the first new sugarcane varieties of RCI origin to be tested commercially in Ferké sugar estates. Their yield performances ranged from 12.8 to 13.8 t sugar/ha, i.e. from 134.0 to 144.8 t cane/ha compared to 161.3 t/ha for the control variety. Although a relatively high level of stem-borer infestation rate recorded, with 15.6% on average (almost three times the tolerable threshold value of 5%), reasonable values of sucrose percent obtained with the promising genotypes, ranged from 12.7 to 13.9% over both crop cycles, compared with 13.6% for the check. Higher heritability values ranging from 61 to 80.5% were observed in traits like sugar yield, sucrose content (62.6%), recoverable sucrose (60.6%), fiber content (72%), stem-borer infestation rate (80.5%), number of internodes/stalk (67.7%), and flowering rate (79.6%). In contrast, lower and moderate values of heritability were observed for Pol juice (59.8%), juice purity (50.5%), cane yield (53%), millable stalk number/ha (29.5%), single stalk weight (36.7%), single stalk height (45%), and single stalk diameter (38.7%).

References

Ali, A., Khan, S. A., Farid, A., Khan, A., Khan, S M., & Ali, N. (2017). Assessment of sugarcane genotypes for cane yield. Sarhad J Agric., 33(4), 668-73.
Chaudhary, R. R. (2001). Genetic variability and heritability in sugarcane. Nepal Agric. Res. J., 4, 56-9.
Dagar, P., Pahuja, S. K., Kaian, S. P., & Singh. (2002). Evaluation of phenotypic variability in sugarcane using principal factor analysis. Ind. J. Sugarc. Technol., 17, 95-100.
Dahlquist, E. (2013). Biomass as Energy source: Resources, Systems and Applications, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, London.
Dumont, T., Thong-Chane, A., Barau, L., Siegmund, B., & Hoarau, J. Y. (2019). Genetic variabilities and genetic gains for yield components in regional sugarcane breeding program on Reunion Island. Sugar Tech. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00718-9
Ebid, M. H. M., Khalil, H. A., Abd-ElAal, A. M., & Fergany, M. A. (2015). Heritability and genotypic and phenotypic correlations among sugarcane yield and some agronomic traits. Egypt L Plant Breed, 19(1), 159-71.
Falconer, D. S. (1989). Introduction to quantitative genetics (3rd ed.). Longman, UK, p. 430.
FAO. (2013). FAO STAT. FAO statistical databases. Retrieved from http://faostat3.fao.org/ (Last accessed Dec. 18, 2015).
FAO. (2014a). FAO STAT, FAO statistical databases. Retrieved from http://faostat3.fao.org/ (Last accessed June 07, 2016).
FAO. (2014b). Global sugarcane production statistics. Retrieved from http//faostat.fao.org/site/567/desktopDefault. Aspx?PageID=567#
Glaz, B., & Kang, M. S. (2008). Location contributions determined via GGE biplot analysis of multi-environment sugarcane genotype-performance trials. Crop Sci., 48, 941-50.
Goldemberg, J. (2008). The Brazilian biofuels industry. Biotechnol. for Biof., 1(1), 1.
Gravois KA & Milligan SB. (1992). Genetic relationship between fiber and sugarcane yield components. Crop Sci., 32(1), 62-7.
Hallauer, A. R., & Miranda, J. B. (1988). Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State Univ. press, Ames, Iowa, p. 468.
Jackson, P. A. (2005). Breeding for improved sugar content in sugarcane. Field Crops Res., 92(2-3), 277-90.
Kang, M. S., Miller, J. D., & Tai, P. Y. P. (1983). Genotypic and phenotypic path analyses and heritability in sugarcane. Crop Sci., 23, 643-47.
Khan, I. A., Dahot, M. U., Seema, N., Yasmin, S., Bibi, S., Raza, S., & Khatri, A. (2009. Genetic variability in sugarcane plantlets developed through in vitro mutagenesis Pakist. J. Biothechnol, 41(1), 153-66.
Kimbeng, C. A., Rattey, A. R., & Hetherington, M. (2002). Interpretation and implications of GxE interactions in advanced stage sugarcane selection trials in central Queensland. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 53(9), 1035-45.
Moore, P. H., & Botha, F. C. (2013). Flowering Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry and functional Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Chichester, UK.
Pandey, R. A. (1989). Variability study in the hybrid progenies of sugarcane (Saccharum complex). Bharatiya Sugar (Oct), 49-51.
Patel MM, Patel HS, Patel AD, Patel MP. (2008). Correlation and path analysis in sugarcane. Ind. Sugar, 31, 911-14.
Péné, C. B., & Béhou, Y. M. (2019b). Evaluation of sugarcane gonotypes under irrigation based on genetic variations and heritability for agronomic traits at early selection stage in Ferké, Ivory Coast. Am. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 7(6), 82-92.
Péné, C., B., & Béhou, Y. M. (2019a). Screening of fifteen sugarcane genotypes under irrigation based on genetic variations and heritability for agro-morphological traits at early selection stage in Ferké, Ivory Coast. Am. J. Biom. Sci. Res., 4(5), 362-75.
Ram, B., & Hemaprabha. (1992). Genetic variability in interspecific progenies in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Ind. J. Genet., 52(2), 192-98.
Ram, B. (2005). Estimation of genetic parameters in different environments and their implications in sugarcane breeding. In. J. Genet., 52(2), 192-98.
Rebettzke, G. J., Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., & Farquhar, G. D. (2002). Selection of carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat. Crop Sci., 42(3), 739-45.
Tadesse, F., Negi, T., Getaneh, A., Dilnesaw, Z., Ayele, N., & Teferi, Y. (2014). Genetic variability and heritability of ten exotic sugarcane genotypes at Wonji sugar estate of Ethiopia. Global Adv. Res. J. Phys. Appl. Sci., 3(4).
Teklu, D. H., Kebede, S. A., & Gebremichael, D. E. (2014). Assessment of genetic variability, genetic advance, correlation and path analysis for morphological traits in sesame genotypes. Asian J. Agric. Res., 8(4), 181-194.
Tena, E., Ayana, A., & Mekbib, F. (2016). Heritability and correlation among sugarcane yields and some agronomic and sugar quality traits in Ethiopia. Am. J. Pant Sci., 7(10), 1453-77.
Waclawovsky, A. J., Sato, P. M., Lembke, C. G., Moore, P. H., & Souza, G. M. (2010). Sugarcane for bioenergy production: An assessment of yield and regulation of sucrose content. Plant Biotechnol. J., 8(3), 263-76.
Wei, X., Jackson, P., Cox, M., & Stringer, J. (2006). Maximizing economic benefits to the whole sugarcane industry from BSES-CSIRO sugarcane improvement program. In: Proc. Aust. Soc. Sugarcane Technol. Vol 2006. PK editorial services, Brisbane, p. 181.
Yang, X., Kandel, R., Song, J., You, Q., & Wang, J. (2018). Sugarcane genome sequencing and genetic mapping. In: Achieving sustainable cultivation of sugarcane. Vol. 2: Breeding, pests and diseases. Ph Rot teds, Univ. Florida, USA.