Interaction Between Two Types of Earthworm and Ageratum on Soil Physicochemical Properties

  • Nweke I. A. Department of Soil Science Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Nigeria
Keywords: Ageratum, chemical elements, earthworm, soil properties


Earthworms are one of the most important soil organisms in tropical ecosystem as they influence mineralogical, structural and microbial composition of soil. The study investigated the effect of interaction between two Nigerian earthworms Eudrilus Eugeniae and Irridodrilus sp and Ageratum species (AG) on soil physicochemical properties in potted experiment. The treatment consisted of 1000g subsoil treated with ageratum (AG); Ageratum + soil inoculated with Eudrilus Eugeniae (AE), Ageratum + soil inoculated with Irridodrilus sp (AI) and control soil not treated (CO). The results of the study showed remarkable differences between the treatments in soil physicochemical properties. The pots inoculated with Eudrilus Eugeniae (AE) relative to other treatments produced high quality ion exchange as evidence from the high (CEC) recorded, enhanced soil aggregation 73% compared to 52% recorded in AI, stabilization of soil aggregates and enhanced availability of nutrient elements by 150% compared to 120% observed in AI. High level of soil pH (9.15) was recorded in AE. AG induced 62% increase in soil erodibility and only 9% increase in availability of soil nutrients. AG was found to be toxic particularly to Irridodrilus whose percentage survival was 0% relative to 67% of Eudrilus Eugeniae whose weight loss was 27%. Ageratum is a bio-pesticide and bio-fertilizer of which its production is simple and cost effective and the efficacy for soil management will require the presence of active soil organisms like earthworms to process Ageratum adequately as was found in this study. The primary materials used in this study are abundantly available and within the reach of farmers. The production and application is eco-friendly, promotes sustainable soil productivity, soil conservation and environmental health. This technology will discourage the use of chemical pesticides and fertilizers in the study area if well integrated in crop production activities.


Ammer, S., Weber, K., Aba, C., Ammer, C., & Prietzel, J. (2005). Factors affecting the distribution and abundance of earthworm communities in pure and converted Scots pine stands Applied Soil Ecol., 35(1), 52-64. Co. Inc. New York 633pp.
Gonzales, G. (2000). Soil organism and litter decomposition. In Anabashi, R. S., & Anabashi, N. K. (Eds.), Modern trend in applied terrestrial ecology (pp. 315-329). Kluwer Academc/Plenum publishers New York.
Hale, C. M., Frelich, L. E., Reich, P. B., & Pastor, J. (2005). Effects of European earthworm inversion on soil characteristics in northern hardwood forests of Minnesota USA. Ecosyst., 8(2), 911-927.
Hale, C., & Host, E. (2005). Assessing the impact of European earthworms’ inversions in beech maple hardwood and aspen-fir boreal forests of the western great lakes region, National park service great lakes inventory and monitoring network report GLKN/2005/11.
Jimens, J., Lavelle, P., & Decaens, T. (2006). The efficiency of soil hand sorting in assessing the abundance and biomass of earthworm community, its usefulness in population dynamics and cohort analysis studies. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 139(1), 265-271.
Kooch, Y., & Jalivand H. (2008). Earthworm as ecosystem engineers and the most important detritivors in forest soils. Pakistan J Biol. Sc., 11(6), 819-825.
Mclean, E. O. (1965). Aluminum. In Klute et al (eds). Methods of soil analysis Soil Agronomy Madison Wisconsin, USA.
Nagavellema, R. P., Wani, S. P., Stephen Laeroix, Pamaja, V. V., Vineal, Babul M., & Saharawi, K. L. (2004). Vermicomposting: recycling waste into valuable organic fertilizer Global theme on Agro ecosystems Report no 8 Patanchem 502, 324.
Nikol Skii, N. N. (1959). Practical soil science (Podivovedemic), Moscow, translated from Russia by Israel programme for scientific translations, Jerusalem, 1963. Distributed by old Boerne press 1-5 port pool lane London, ECL. UK.
Nkidi-Kizza, P. J. W., Biggar, H. M., Selina, J. H., Genuchtem, P. J. V., Davidson, W. J. M., & Nelson, D. R. (1984). The equivalence of two conceptual models for describing ion-exchange during transport through an aggravated oxisols. Water Res., 20, 1123-1130.
Nweke, I. A. (2013). Plant nutrient release composition in vermicompost as influenced by Eudrilus eugenae using different organic diets. J. Ecol. Natur. Environ., 5(11), 346-351.
Nweke, I. A. (2017). Effect of compost and earthworm production on soil properties, growth and dry matter yield of maize in crude oil degraded soil. J. Soil Sci. Environ. Manage., 8(1), 1-10.
Rombke, J., Jansch, S., & Diden, W. (2005). The use of earthworms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts. For. Ecol. Manage., 41(2), 42-53.
Samaranayake, J. W. K., & Wijekoon, S. (2010). Effect of selected earthworm on soil fertility, plant growth and vermicomposting. Tropical Agric. Res. Ext., 13(2), 33-40.
Sautter, K. D., Brown, C. G., James, S. W., Pasini, D. H., Nunesand, N., & Benito, P. (2006). Present knowledge on earthworm biodiversity in the state of Parana, Brazil. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 42(1), 321-332.
Sheehan, C., Kirwan, L., Connoly, J., & Bolger, T. (2006). The effect of earthworm functional group diversity on nitrogen dynamics in soils. Soil Bio. Biochem., 41(2), 2629-2636.
Steel, G. D., & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach (2nd ed). McGraw Hill Book.