A Popular Participation Model to Avoid a New Governance Crisis in Venezuela and Peru: A Study of the Oil and Mining Industries
Abstract
Shared governance through popular participation and social oversight represents a significant challenge and opportunity in combating corruption and enhancing public policy effectiveness. This study, which involved a survey of 101 refugees in Brazil and employed Structural Equation Modeling, proposes a theoretical model titled Popular Participation and Cultural Change to Reduce Corruption (PMRC).
Given Venezuela's status as the largest oil producer in the world, the research focused on the following central question: What is the impact of Venezuelans' social participation in public policies related to gasoline supply?
Despite receiving financial aid from China and Russia to support both the public and private sectors, the Venezuelan government charges $1.36 per liter of gasoline—the highest price in Latin America—despite a production cost of only $0.035 per liter.
The study's key conclusion is that the governments of Venezuela and Peru are exploiting societal ignorance by closing educational institutions and restricting access to comprehensive knowledge, limiting citizens to only basic information.
The research model suggests that promoting knowledge-sharing within society and with other nations holds transformative potential for national cultural change, ultimately contributing to the reduction of corruption. The study emphasizes that combating corruption requires shifting from a purely legalistic approach to fostering an ethical cultural transformation, beginning with exemplary governance practices.
References
Alcadipani, R., & Crubellate, J. M. (2003). Cultura organizacional: Generalizações improváveis e conceituações imprecisas. RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, 43(2).
Alvesson, M. (2003). Understanding organizational culture. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 7(3).
Arnett, D. B., & Wittmann, C. (2014). Improving marketing success: The role of tacit knowledge exchange between sales and marketing. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 324-330.
Azuma, H., & Kashiwagi, K. (1987). Descriptions for an intelligent person: A Japanese study. Japanese Psychological Research, 29, 17-26.
Bardhan, P. K. (2006). The economist’s approach to the problem of corruption. World Development, 34(2), 341-348.
Barney, J. B., & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199277698.001.0001
Berry, J. W. (1974). Radical cultural relativism and the concept of intelligence. In Culture and cognition: Readings in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 225-229).
Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428
Chesbrough, H. W., & Teece, D. J. (1996). When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 65–73.
Choo, C. W. (2002). Information management for the intelligent organisation: The art of scanning the environment (3rd ed.). Information Today.
Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
Collier, P. (2000). How to reduce corruption. African Development Review, 12, 191-205.
Crozier, M. (1969). El fenómeno burocrático. Amorrortu.
Dauber, D., Fink, G., & Yolles, M. (2012). A configuration model of organizational culture. SAGE Open, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012441482
Davis, C. L., AMP, R. A., & Coleman, K. M. (2004). The influence of party systems on citizens’ perceptions of corruption and electoral response in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 37(6), 677-703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004265879
Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of organisational life. Addison-Wesley.
Duan, Y., Huang, L., Cheng, H., Yang, L., & Ren, T. (2021). The moderating effect of cultural distance on the cross-border knowledge management and innovation quality of multinational corporations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(1), 85–116.
Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford University Press.
Ferreira, M. C., Assmar, E. M. L., & Souto, S. O. (2002). O individualismo e o coletivismo como indicadores de culturas nacionais: Convergências e divergências teórico-metodológicas. Psicologia em Estudo, 7(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722002000100011
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
