For Organizational Communication that Promotes the Sharing of Tacit Knowledge
Objectives - focusing the study's focus on sharing tacit knowledge in non-profit organizations (NPOs) in Portugal and taking as a case study the Portuguese volunteer firefighters (FBs), we listed as objectives ascertaining the main communicational barriers to tacit knowledge sharing and identify action strategies to be implemented by these organizations, with a view to promoting this communication.
Design / methodology / approach - A literature review on the barriers to sharing tacit knowledge, namely in its communicational dimension, was followed by a qualitative study, carried out with 8 Portuguese volunteer fire brigades, which allowed an analysis of the prevalence of these barriers and the determination of the main measures to be implemented, with a view to combating them.
Conclusions - It was possible to conclude which are the most prevalent communication barriers in these organizations and what measures to be implemented with a view to combating these barriers and promoting the sharing of tacit knowledge by increasing more effective communication.
Research limitations - This research focuses exclusively on the sharing of tacit knowledge, not considering other forms of knowledge. As this is a case study, although with very heterogeneous organizations, it cannot be replicated for different realities.
Originality / value - Studies in this area, aimed at the NPOs are scarce, as opposed to what happens in the private and public sectors. The case study option of organizations such as the Portuguese FBs, unique in their action and identity, accompanies the need, increasingly recognized by society, in enabling these organizations of competences for the best possible performance, in the face of the tragic events that have occurred in recent years in Portugal.
Baker, K. A. (2002). Chapter 13 - Organizational Communication. Retrieved from http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/doe/benchmark/ch13.pdf
Bardin, L. (2006). Análise de conteúdo, Edições 70, Lisboa.
Baumard, P. (1999). Tacit knowledge in organizations. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217375
Blair, D. (2002). Knowledge management: hype, hope, or help? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1019-1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10113
Cloutier, E., Ledoux, É., & Fournier, P. S. (2012). Knowledge Transmission in Light of Recent Transformations in the Workplace. Relations industrielles/ Industrial Relations, 67(2), 304-324. https://doi.org/10.7202/1009089ar
Connelly, C., & Kelloway, E. (2003). Predictors of employees, perceptions of knowledge-sharing culture. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(5/6), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730310485815
Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1108/nlw.2000.101.6.282.4
Disterer, G. (2003). Fostering knowledge sharing: why and how? IADIS International Conference E-Society, 2003, Lisbon.
Fahey, L., & Prusak, L. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review, 40(3), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165954
Haldin-Herrgard, T. (2000). Difficulties in the Diffusion of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930010359252
Hendricks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 16(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1441(199906)6:2%3C91::aid-kpm54%3E3.0.co;2-m
Holste, J., & Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 128-140, https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015615
Housel, T., & Bell, A. (2001). Measuring and managing knowledge, McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston.
Jóia, L. (2006). Distributive knowledge transfer processes in G2G endeavours: a heuristic frame. Knowledge Transfer for eGovernment: Seeking Better eGovernment Solutions, Verlag University, 2006. p.170-183. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-885-7.ch103
Joia, L., & Lemos, B. (2010). Relevant Factors for Tacit Knowledge Transfer Within Organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(3), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011050139
Laudon, K., & Laudon J. (2012). Management Information Systems: managing the digital firm. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Laupase, R. (2003). Rewards: do they encourage tacit knowledge sharing in management consulting firms? Case studies approach. In Coakes. E. (ed.), Knowledge Management: Current Issues and Challenges (pp. 92-103). Idea Group Inc, Hershey. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-93177-751-3.ch008
Leonhard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165946
Marques, J. R. (2016). A Importância da Comunicação Eficaz nas Organizações. Retrieved from http://www.unincor.br/images/imagens/2016/Informativo_novembro.pdf
Michailova, S., & Husted, K. (2003). Knowledge-sharing hostility in Russian firms. California Management Review, 45(3), 59-77. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166176
Mohajan, H. (2016). Sharing of tacit knowledge in organizations: A Review. American Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, 3(2), 6-19.
O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C. (1998). If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices. California Management Review, 40(3), 154-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165948
Oliveira, M. J. S. P., & Pinheiro, P. (2020). Factors and Barriers to Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Non-Profit Organizations–a Case Study of Volunteer Firefighters in Portugal. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00665-x
Riege, A. (2005). Three-Dozen Knowledge-Sharing Barriers Managers Must Consider. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602746
Riege, A. (2007). Actions to overcome knowledge transfer barriers in MNCs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710728231
Roberts, J. (2000). From Know-How to Show-How: Questioning the Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Knowledge Transfer. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12(4), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/713698499
Smith, E. A. (2001). The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110411733
Stauffer, D. (1999). Why people hoard knowledge. Across the Board, 36(8), 16-21.
Strieder, R. (2009). Diretrizes para elaboração de projetos de pesquisa, Joaçaba: Editora Unoesc.
Sun, H., Liu, J., & Chen, H. (2018). Communication in Human Resource Management. Human Resources Management and Services, 1(1), 1-5.
Sveiby, K. (1997). The new organizational wealth: managing and measuring knowledge- based assets, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-1000
Sveiby, K., & Simons, R. (2002). Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 420-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210450388
Verghese, A. K. (2017). Internal Communication: Practices and Implications. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 14(3), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2690026
Vij, S., & Farooq, R. (2014). Knowledge Sharing Orientation and Its Relationship with Business Performance: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, XII(3), 17-41. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijkm.2014070103
World Health Association (1994). Division of Mental Health, Qualitative Research for Health Programmes. Geneva: WHA.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).