Application of Reservoir Performance Indices on Kainji Reservoir System

  • Mohammed Jiya Mamman Department of Crop Production Technology, Niger State College of Agriculture Mokwa, Nigeria
  • Otache Y Matins Department of Agricultural and Bio resource Engineering Federal University of Technology Minna Niger State, Nigeria
Keywords: reservoir, operation, inflow, outflow, storages randomness

Abstract

Resilience may be defined as a yardstick that specifies the extent a reservoir recuperates when it fails previously. A reliable water resource system speedily returns to an acceptable state after a failure. Vulnerability measures severity or extent of failures or letdowns, if and once they occur. Sustainability index (SI) provides a sign of fundamental nature with respects to probable unwanted repercussions if imbalance of waters occurs. Sustainability index (SI) can also be expressed as a mean of reliability, resilience and vulnerability. This study employs commonly used indices (reliability, resilience, and Vulnerability) to assess the performance of Kainji reservoir system. To attain this, rain fall and river flow data were obtained from Kainji Hydrological station in New Bussa Nigeria. Analysis using MAKESENS software was used on the rainfall and river flows to look at the extreme events. In order to determine the performance of the reservoir system some reservoir performance indices were employed, these are; vulnerability, resilience, and sustainability index. This is achieved by adopting relevant existing equations. Reservoir flows and storages ware employed, different draft ratios were considered (0.3- 1.0). Varying demand levels were also chosen (0 – 0.8) as against the coefficient of variation to look at the monotonic behaviour of resilience against the various levels of demand. Volume reliability falls repeatedly as draft/ MAR upsurges and bigger values were attained as S/MAR rises. The analysis on the reservoir shows that as demand decreases the sustainability increases and also the higher the storage ratio the higher the sustainability index. It also shows that as draft ratio increases the resilience decreases, and because the draft ratio decreases the resilience increases. The reservoir system was classified as within year system, which suggests high resilience, less vulnerable and sustainable. The operation rule shows the need for optimization.

References

Abdulkadir, I. S., Salami, A. M., Anwar, A. D., & Kareem, A. G. (2013). Modelling of Hydropower Reservoir Variables for Energy Generation: NeuralNetwork Approach. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 6(3), 39 -49. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v6i3.12
Adeloye, A. J., & Montasari, M. (1999). Predicting Critical Period to Characterise Over-Year and Within-Year Reservoir Systems. Water Resource Management, 13, 383- 407.
Bhunya P. K., & Jain S. K. (2010). Reliability, resilience and vulnerability of a multipurpose storage reservoir / Confiance, résilience et vulnérabilité d'un barrage multi- objectifs. Hydrological Sciences Journal Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/thsj20
Dukiya, J. I. (2013). Spatial Scrutiny of the Impacts of Kainji Hydropower Resevoir on the Down Stream Communities an Overview. A Journal of Geoinformatics and Geostatist, 4(4), 105-113.
Hashimoto, I., Loucks, D.H., Stedinger, D. (1982). dependability, resilience and vulnerabilityfor water resources system performance evaluation. Water Resources Research, 18 (1), 14- 20.
Hui., Z., Dedi, L., Shenglian, G., Lihua, X., Pan, L., Jiabo, Y., Yujie, Z., Jiayu, Z., & Youjiang, S., (2019). Quantitative assessment of adaptive measures on optimal water resources allocation by using reliability, resilience, vulnerability indicators. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 34, 103–119 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01753-4
Issa S.T., Rozi M., and Majid, R. (2014). The critical period of reservoir systems considering performance indices on Malaysia Rivers. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 3(2), 166-173. Science Publishing Corporation. Retrieved from www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJET
Kang, R., Shengzhi, H., Qiang, H., & Hao, W. (2019). Assessing the reliability, resilience and vulnerability of water supply system under multiple uncertain sources.  Journal of Cleaner Production 252, 119806
Kjeldseen, T. G., & Rosbjarg, W. (2004). Alternative reliability, resilience and Susceptibility estimators for risk assessments of water resources systems. Journal of Hydrology Science, 49(5), 755– 767.
Kundzewicz, Z. W., & Laski, A. (1995) Reliability-related criteria in water supply system studies. In: New Uncertainty Concepts in Hydrology and Water Resources (ed. by Z. W. Kundzewicz). Cambridge University Press (in press).
Kundzewicz, Z. D., & Kindler, T. (1995). various criteria for assessment of reliability aspects of water resources systems. In: Simonovic, S.P., 56-61.
Mc-Mahon, T. E., Adeloye, A. I., & Zhou, S. (2006). Understanding performance procedures of Reservoirs, Journal of Hydrology, 324, 359–382.
Mohammed, J. M, Otache, Y. M, & Jibril, I. (2018). Analysis and Characterization of Kainji Reservoir Inflow System. Environ Anal Eco stud, 1(1). EAES.000504. 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.31031/EAES.2018.01.000504
Moy., W. E., Cohon, J. R., ReVelle, C. G. (1986). A programming model for analysis of the reliability, resilience, and susceptibility of a water supply reservoir. Water Resources. Research, 22(4), 467– 498.
Oyebande, R., & Balogun, F. (1992). Water Resources organisation in the Semi-arid Areas of Northern Nigeria. Cannadian. Journal of Development Studies Special Issue, 209-226.
Richard, M. J. T., & Mc-mahon, A. (1996). Hydrological Sciences -Journal- Des –Sciences Hydrologiques, 41(1).
Sharad, K. F., & Jain, D. (2010). Investigating the performance of statistical indices for performance assessment of a reservoir. Journal of Hydrology. Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, 247667, India
Silva, A.H. & Portela, F. N. (2012). Probablistic Assessment of Reservoir storage –Yield Interactions in Portugal Journal of Hydrological Engineering — American Society of Civil Engineering, (18), 562 –76.
Suleiman, Y. D. (2013). Effect of Climate on Hydropower Generation in the Lower Niger -River Basin, Nigeria. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.
Suleiman, Y. I. M., & Fabiyi, I. P. (2014). Afrrevv Stechnology, an International Journal of Science and Technology Bahirr Darr, Ethiopia, 3(2), 19-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/stech.v3i2.2
Thomas, A. M., Adebayo, J. A., & Sen-Lin, Z. (2005). Understanding performance measures of reservoirs. Journal of Hydrology, 324(2006), 359–382. http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jhydrol
Vogel, R. N., & Bolognese, R. B. (1995). Storage-Reliability-Resistance-Yield Relations for Over-Year Water Supply Systems. Water Resources Research. (In Press).
Vogel, R. N., Lane, Y., Ravindrian, F. S., & Kirshen, D. (1999). Storage – Reservoir Characteristics in the United States. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, American Society of Civil Engineers, 125(5), 246-257.
Vogel, R. G., & Stedinger, J. N. (1987). Generalised- Storage-Reliability-Yield Interaction. Journal of Hydrology, 89, 302-326.
Yafang, C., Ping, F., Jianzhu, L., Yuangang, G., & Peizhen, R. (2019). Water Supply Risk Analysis Based on Runoff Sequence Simulation with Change Point under Changing Environment. Advances in Meteorology, 2019, 16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9619254.
Zongxue, Y., Jinno, J., Kawanura, N., Takesaki, C., & Ito, F. (1998). Performance risk Scrutiny for Fukuokaa water supply system. Water Resources Management, 12, 14–32.
Zorica, S., & Bojan, S. (2017). An Extension of the Sustainability Index Definition in Water Resources Planning and Management. Water Resour Manage. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1609-6
Published
2020-05-27
Section
Articles